data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13466/13466bbde666bcfcccfd0f7a110e5a04cfa75649" alt=""
Reading Time – 5 minutes
I’ve discussed this topic before but I haven’t in a long while, and this is a popular subject, so consider this an update.
As always, I’m objective. Unlike most people, I don’t take one side or the other and plant myself there screaming about it because of my upbringing, feelings, culture, Societal Programming, hope, or anger.
Instead, I look at the data and draw the most likely conclusions based on what I have available. This raises the probability of me being correct (though of course, it doesn’t guarantee it).
This is, for example, why I’m not a left-winger or Trump supporter or anarchist, but I’m instead a minarchist libertarian because, based on the data, history, economics, and geopolitics, having a government but keeping it as small as humanly possible is the least-bad way for running a modern-day society full of human beings (until someone or AI invents something never before seen).
It’s the same with hardcore Christians/Muslims/religionists vs. atheists. None of these groups are 100% rational (though I agree some are worse than others).
Here are my main opinions and analysis.
1. There is no Judeo/Christian/Muslim god, nor any other gods worshipped by any religion (Hinduism, etc).
This is all false Societal Programming invented by various elites 2,000+ years ago to assist them in controlling the masses.
If you believe in a god (or gods) like this, that’s fine and that’s your choice.
Because I’m outcome-independent, an individualist, and I’m not an atheist (more on that in a minute), I have no problem with you believing these things.
I’m saying there is no scientific data or any real evidence verified by science whatsoever, modern or historical, that indicates the existence of a Judeo/Christian/Muslim god as described in the various holy texts.
The holy texts you have, like the Bible, were written by primitive desert tribes thousands of years ago and have been edited literally thousands of times by various elites over the centuries.
This does not qualify as valid scientific evidence. Quite the opposite; it points to these things most likely being wrong.
FYI if you didn’t know, I was raised Catholic, spent eight years in a Catholic school, unlike most Christians, I have actually read most of the Bible.
So that is where the atheists are correct. Now I’ll describe where the atheists are likely wrong.
2. There is evidence of intelligent design in the universe, indicating a creator or creators of some kind.
Despite what many atheists think, there is indeed a lot of scientific evidence for the universe, astronomy, and even biology having been created by someone on purpose.
Is there conclusive proof of this? No. (At least, not yet; I think if/when AI takes over we might find out.)
Is there scientific evidence of this? Yes. A lot.
So while we don’t know for sure, the hardcore atheist who says definitively “There is no god, I know this for sure, and no one ‘made’ the universe, it was just created by accident or by nature” is likely just as wrong as the Christan who says the Christian God is looking down at you right now watching to see if you use his name in vain so he can send you to hell if you don’t repent.
3. I was 70% convinced simulation theory was correct. Today I am 80% convinced.
If you don’t know what simulation theory is, it’s the concept that this entire universe is actually some sort of advanced simulation or computer program that was designed by a creator or creators unknown for research, entertainment, or to solve some kind of problem.
The simulation is real to us but only a simulation or construct to the creator/creators.
I’ve said before that I was 70% in the simulation theory camp. Today I’m 80%, perhaps even 85% there.
The longer I live and the more I learn and research, the more likely this explanation becomes.
The reason is simulation theory is the only explanation that explains everything, including things like the Big Bang, dark matter, the Fermi Paradox, why the laws of physics break down if you zoom into an atom with a microscope, and so on.
Science has no real answers for most of these things.
Atheists have no answers for these things.
Religionists have fairy tales that are quickly contradicted by facts so they don’t have any answers either.
But simulation theory, if it’s real, explains almost all of it.
As just one example, where are all the aliens?
One possible answer is that there are none because it’s a simulation so we’re the only ones, and the universe is just background like the distant mountains in Skyrim you can never travel to.
Or perhaps there’s only one set of intelligent life per galaxy, forever separated by vast distances; that’s just as plausible.
Simulation theory is far more likely than this all happened by accident or “nature” (atheists), or some angry, touchy god who was so insecure he created a universe full of servants to worship him (Christians, Muslims, Jews,) or a god who came out of the navel of another god to create the universe only to destroy it again later (Hindus), or because the entire universe is inside a black hole in a different universe (some scientists), or whatever.
Do I 100% believe this is a simulation? Nope. I don’t have enough data to state this 100% definitively. (See? That’s what objectivity looks like. Sometimes you’re just not sure, and that’s a valid opinion to have when you don’t have enough data.)
I said I’m 80%, not 100%. This may not be a simulation at all, but all the data points there more than it points to any other explanation humans have come up with so far.
Some people respond that simulation theory “doesn’t count” because it doesn’t actually explain anything.
Okay, we were all made by someone, but who made that someone? It doesn’t answer the “Is there a god?” question.
That’s right. It explains the nature of the universe but it doesn’t explain who the creator/creators are/were.
But you know what? You might have to get used to the real possibility that even if humans take over the entire Milky Way galaxy we may never know the answer to that question, which is hard for human beings to accept.
That’s why they invented things like religion. Emotional humans are made uncomfortable by not knowing something for sure so they make up fantasies that make them feel better.
And hey, I love fantasy. It’s my thing. I think Lord of the Rings is pretty awesome.
But I don’t think it’s real.
So when Christians point to evidence that the universe was created by someone, I agree with them. I just wasn’t created by their god out of the Bible. It was more likely created by one or more weird creatures sitting at some kind of crazy machine outside of our universe and we’re all living inside it.
If that makes life sound useless or depressing, I don’t agree.
I’ve addressed this before in my blogs: If this is a simulation, it is 100% real to you and me, therefore it doesn’t really matter if it’s a simulation or not, or if there is a god or not.
Completely regardless of the existence of a god or the nature of our reality, we live in a universe with very specific laws.
If you follow these laws and take advantage of these laws, you can build a life of great happiness and meaning. I certainly have.
If you ignore those laws or live life in opposition to those laws, you’re going to experience pain and unhappiness. That’s what most people do.
I’ve compared this to playing World of Warcraft (forgive my dated reference; I’m an old man).
You’re playing World of Warcraft and having a great time. You’re in a group of a few other people going through a dungeon. Finally, you come to the main boss dragon and start to fight him, and one of the people in your group says, “I just realized this is all fake. It’s just a computer program made up of ones and zeros. None of this is real, therefore it has no meaning.”
He just stands there doing nothing, and because of his inaction, the dragon kills all of you.
Now you’re pissed and everyone hates that guy.
Instead, when you play World of Warcraft or any other “fake” game, you’re there to play the game.
You’re playing to enjoy yourself and (hopefully) playing to win.
It doesn’t matter if it’s real or fake or a simulation or whatever in the context of the game.
It also doesn’t matter who the programmers were who made the game. They could be amazing people or they could be total idiots or weirdos. It doesn’t matter.
The universe is the game you’re in, and unless you kill yourself right now (which you won’t), you’re here to play the game.
So stop worrying about god and shit, get to work, and play it.
It’s that simple.
Leave your comment below, but be sure to follow the Five Simple Rules.
AlphaOmega
Posted at 01:37 pm, 18th February 2025According to principles of quantum physics consciousness would eventually arise spontaneously from empty space.
Then you can consider that consciousness or awareness does not need to have physical body as we know it.
Pretty much in every religion there is something like mysticism where they interpret that god is a collection of all things together, so rather than it being something separate from the observer, the observer is one of the parts that make god.
So I would say these three things together is sufficient, or something to add?
Kurt Niznik
Posted at 04:31 pm, 18th February 2025One problem with assuming the universe was ‘created’ somehow is that no matter what explanation you come up with there will be some level of infinite regress (i.e. “well then if X created the universe who created X?”, or, “if the universe began X way at X time what was here before?”). For some reason humans have accepted that space could be infinite but really balk at the idea of infinite time, yet according to relativity space and time are inextricably linked, so if one is infinite the other must be (I think, although the BB theory says time and space were created together so before that there was no time, but then how was there a ‘before’?).
Perhaps infinity = God?
Count me as believing none of the theistic or techno modern explanations at any more than 15% certainty.
Mo
Posted at 07:01 pm, 18th February 2025In a recent livestream, you mentioned that your anti-aging doctor wrote his med-school thesis about humans being created by some other entities. Have you asked him to share his thesis with you? It would perfectly fit into this conversation. Maybe these entities who created humans are the ones running the simulation.
According to Gnosticism, this dimension is some kind of “soul-trap” created by the Demiurge (not God) and maintained by his Archons who harvest energy from us. The author Robert Monroe calls this energy “loosh.” But who knows.
Caleb Jones
Posted at 09:48 pm, 18th February 2025That’s up to you.
We may very well be a “part” of god. You and I are each a cell in his body. Possible.
Caleb Jones
Posted at 09:49 pm, 18th February 2025Yes, I addressed that in the article.
I don’t view that as a problem.
Caleb Jones
Posted at 09:52 pm, 18th February 2025I have not because I wouldn’t read it. I know his main points and they seem sound.
No. They would be aliens from another star, not the creators of the simulation.
Creators of the simulation would not have to come here in big metal spaceships or whatever and “seed” the planet with DNA or whatever.
The creators could just snap us into existence (or their equivalent) from outside of our universe with a press of a button.
If Earth was seeded by aliens, the aliens are just as much a part of the simulation as we are.
AlphaOmega
Posted at 11:06 am, 20th February 2025“One problem with assuming the universe was ‘created’ somehow is that no matter what explanation you come up with there will be some level of infinite regress (i.e. “well then if X created the universe who created X?”, or, “if the universe began X way at X time what was here before?”). For some reason humans have accepted that space could be infinite but really balk at the idea of infinite time, yet according to relativity space and time are inextricably linked, so if one is infinite the other must be (I think, although the BB theory says time and space were created together so before that there was no time, but then how was there a ‘before’?).
Perhaps infinity = God?
Count me as believing none of the theistic or techno modern explanations at any more than 15% certainty.”
This is not an issue in the everything together is god model. Everything has always existed.
Dandy Dude
Posted at 12:45 pm, 20th February 2025The fact that Madonna went from how she looked on Dick Tracy to how she looks now, is proof enough for me that there is no god. Or if there is, he’s a real sick son of a bitch!
Caleb Jones
Posted at 01:02 pm, 20th February 2025Haha. As I’ve said before, Madonna is a good example of taking the “I never want to look older” thing too far and for too long.
In her 50s she actually looked pretty good. But she really fucked up her 60s when she should have just let some of that go.